Military stories from past to present, both wars.

Google scares the Crap out of the Military and Me…

May 23rd, 2012 Posted in Military | No Comments »

Guys,

I came across this website that has some great stuff on it http://www.informationdissemination.net/ and I encourage you to put this in your weekly roundup of important reads…

One of the pieces I watched was a video with Michael Jones, Chief Technology Advocate at Google Ventures coming in and basically scaring the crap out of the Military attending.  The first three minutes is very slow, then it explodes with what Google maps has done in the last few years. A project designed so that somebody could find the guys house for a party to years later, someone building a 3d picture of OBL compound in Pakistan before we even knew he was there. The ability to spy now on us, them anyone is amazing with a program called “Field Agent.”

 I mean it truly is “SkyNet”. How the internet can turn anyone with an Iphone into a spy and what they can do with it.

It’s about 40 minutes long but WELL worth the time. Scary times
S/F
Taco
here is the link below:

http://youtu.be/Dk3IIOimGwE

Tags: , , ,

The Mental Health of Military Children by Emily Isenberger

May 17th, 2012 Posted in The SandGram v1.0 | 3 Comments »

The Mental Health of Military ChildrenChildren of active duty service members often face unique problems when a parent deploys, particularly when it comes to mental and emotional well-being. While mental health issues certainly do not affect all military children, recent research has demonstrated enough of a trend to raise alarm and many looking for online counseling programs are beginning to see the need to specialize in helping military children. In most cases, the key to combatting deployment-related stress is through community and camaraderie, so group counseling will be especially important. Children who feel as if the adults around them understand their fears and sadness, or who could be around other children in the same position, are likely to fare far better then those who feel utterly alone.

Since the U.S. engagement in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, deployments have surged, which means that record numbers of military families have seen at least one parent absent for extended periods. Deployments typically last for at least 13 months. Children of all ages tend to view this absence with a mix of emotions that intensify over time.

A study published in The Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine took a hard look at the emotional health of military children and families between 2003 and 2006. Researchers found that children were indeed suffering. Nearly 17% of the children studied had been officially diagnosed at some point during the deployment with a mental disorder such as depression or anxiety. The length of time was paramount, the study reported that, “Children of parents who spent more time deployed between 2003 and 2006 fared worse than children whose parents were deployed for a shorter duration.”

A separate study conducted by the National Military Family Association, a non-profit group, found similar results, but placed an emphasis on the remaining parent’s own mental health. Caregivers who were themselves struggling to cope with the deployment were often not able to identify or address similar struggles in their children, the report, published in 2009, concluded.

“We have found there is a direct correlation between the mental health of the caregiver and the well-being of the child,” the study said. Teenagers tended to be the most prone to mental illness or anxiety, particularly in situations where there were also younger children at home. The NMFA stated, “They are often encumbered by the feeling of trying to keep the family going, along with anger over changes in their schedules, increased responsibility, and fear for their deployed parent.”

Young teenagers and adolescents are also the demographic most likely to fall victim to bullying, both at school and online. Children who are already feeling anxious about a missing parent tend to be more fragile emotionally, and may be more subject to teasing and harassment. On the flip side, they may be more likely to perpetrate those behaviors themselves. This is particularly true of military children who do not live on traditional bases. On a military post, nearly all children, parents, and teachers can relate to what a deployment feels like, and can watch for the signs of a child who is suffering. This is not usually the case in civilian communities.

Members of the National Guard and Army Reserve are usually the most at risk in terms of community understanding, as they live most of their lives as ordinary civilians. “Our study found that Guard and Reserve caregivers reported fewer supports for their families and worse mental health than those in the active component,” the NMFA said. “They find themselves ‘suddenly military’ without resources to support them.”

Most of the time, the very family that is split apart by the deployment must be the strongest part of children’s worlds. This means that the remaining parent must be present, vigilant, and willing to talk about the tough issues. Seeking out community resources for additional help is usually also important.

Mental health problems for military children are not inevitable. Families can plan ahead for the pitfalls of deployment. Most military installations offer counseling services for families of deployed service members. National organizations like Operation Military Kids, an Army initiative designed to support children of deployed personnel, also offer a bevy of resources. Taking advantage of help when it is offered is one of the best ways for military families to stay on top of their health, and stay strong for the eventual return of the deployed parent.

Tags: ,

Bobby Thompson, Fake Navy Poser caught!!

May 2nd, 2012 Posted in Military | 3 Comments »

Guys,

What a great day this turned out to be!!  I opened my news to see that “BobbyThompson_AdditionalInformation” a fake Navy LtCmdr who has ripped off lots of folks out there pretending to operate a sort of Navy Relief Nonprofit.   This Ain’t Hell posted about him two years ago and I threw something up when I read about his antics while on a layover in Tampa back in 2010.  If you have minute, go check out this link from This Ain’t Hell and my link on him.  Be very careful how you donate and click over on the right where it says “Any Marine for profit.com” to learn more about what a lot of these “non profits” doing.  Now is it me or does he sort of look like Uncle Jerry from the Grateful Dead??

Of course it’s Fake Navy guys this week, so here is the other guy for your records.  John Carl Pequignot is 85 and I’m not sure if it’s old age setting in but he has been exposed on his fraud claims and it’s really sad…  Once again Jonn Lilyea from This Ain’t Hell does some great work.

http://www.journalgazette.net/article/20120422/LOCAL/304229940/1002/LOCAL

Navy shoots down veteran’s war stories

Despite clash with official file, he stands by claims

Vivian Sade | The Journal Gazette

FORT WAYNE – John Carl Pequignot, 85, of Fort Wayne has told many people he fought the Japanese in three major battles as a Navy corpsman during World War II and that he was injured three separate times.

Depending on where he is discussing his war history, he may talk about when he was taken as prisoner of war and held in a camp in Luzon, Philippines, or sometimes it’s Guam.

The recounting of his military career often includes details about a clash where half of his face was blown off by a grenade. He underwent 27 reconstructive surgeries made possible by hip bone parts donated by more than a dozen Marines he saved, he has said.

After the war, Pequignot said, President Harry Truman personally presented him a sword for his heroism.

For years, Pequignot has told some portions of these stories to youth groups, at churches and in retirement homes. In 2007, he was presented a Silver Star, the third-highest honor in the military. In 2010, he was made an honorary member of the Indianapolis Korean War Veterans Association, Chapter 259, and is featured in the group’s online video project, “Tell America.”

The Journal Gazette ran a story on Veterans Day in November in which Pequignot was prominently featured talking about his World War II experiences.

But according to Navy records, Pequignot was never in battle and never left the U.S. during his military service. There is no official documentation that would indicate he was a POW, and archivists at Truman’s presidential library said they have no record of a meeting. In fact, the name Pequignot does not appear at all.

A convicted thief and bank robber after the war, Pequignot has insisted for years that the Navy lost all of his overseas records. But military records obtained by The Journal Gazette from the National Archives and Records Administration in St. Louis seem to account for almost every day Pequignot was in the service. Nothing in the records corroborates any of his military stories.

Because of the discrepancies, U.S. Sen. Richard Lugar’s office has backed away from a push to award Pequignot the Medal of Honor – an award numerous local residents have championed on Pequignot’s behalf.

Major discrepancies

Too young for active service, the records show Pequignot worked in Fort Wayne at the Pennsylvania Railroad yards until he was accepted into active service on July 28, 1944, a month before his 18th birthday and a year before the war ended. He was discharged on July 12, 1946.

He served the majority of those two years in California, according to military records.

Pequignot claims to have been a corpsman, an enlisted person with some medical training who serves the Navy and Marines as a medic in times of war. But Navy records do not list any medical training for Pequignot.

Asked about the discrepancy, Pequignot said he took a two-week course on an island – he did not remember its name – north of Australia in the fall of 1944.

During a battle in Saipan in November 1944, he claims to have received serious injuries to his leg from flying shrapnel while involved in hand-to-hand combat. He was then transferred by the USS Comfort to a military hospital to recuperate until March 28, he said.

But during that time, official military records place him at a Naval training center in Oklahoma.

Pequignot tells of another battle he was in on the island of Iwo Jima on Feb. 19, 1945. But Navy records show he was in California then. Asked about the conflicting dates, Pequignot said his memory “may be off by a few days or so.”

Pequignot has said he was critically injured when a grenade detonated mid-air in Okinawa on April 1, 1945, blowing off half his face and jaw. According to Pequignot, he recuperated in a base hospital in Okinawa for five months before being sent back to the States.

He claims to have undergone 27 surgeries to repair the damage. The first surgery was performed in Okinawa, he said, when 15 Marines volunteered to donate parts of their hip bones to help reconstruct his face.

But according to documents related to his official military discharge in July 1946, Pequignot “required neither medical nor dental attention.” Despite his claims of critical injuries and months of surgeries and rehabilitation, military records indicate his health was normal with “no defects, abnormalities or injuries.”

Records confirm he served aboard the USS Shangri-La, as he claims, but the Navy said he was aboard the ship after the war, from Oct. 26, 1945, to May 17, 1946.

Medals and ribbons

Jonn Lilyea, a retired infantry platoon sergeant who served in Desert Storm, recently noted Pequignot’s claims in his popular military blog, “This ain’t hell, but you can see it from here.”

“Saipan, Iwo Jima and Okinawa were operations by different (Marine Corps) units,” Lilyea wrote, “so he must have really been bounced around.”

After leaving the Navy, Pequignot was a Fort Wayne police officer until he was convicted in 1958 for involvement in a car theft ring.

Six years later, he was convicted of bank robbery in Allen County.

All of that “was long ago” and has no bearing on his military record, he said.

In later years, Pequignot was a high school sports referee and did janitorial work.

He has qualified for 50 percent disability pay from the Department of Veterans Affairs based on “conditions of military service.”

He receives $845 a month as compensation for tinnitus and hearing loss. Claims for shrapnel wounds and tremors of the hand and arm were denied, according to VA documents.

Pequignot has a number of medals and ribbons, many in a glass case and some on the uniform he wears when he makes presentations, he said. He claims to have three Purple Hearts, an Asiatic-Pacific Ribbon, China Service Ribbon, Japan Occupation Ribbon, Distinguished Marksman Ribbon and a Presidential Citation.

Official records show Pequignot received a World War II Victory Medal and Victory Ribbon, which were given to all veterans who served during WWII, and an Asiatic-Pacific Ribbon, which was given to all veterans who served in the Pacific.

In a ceremony at Allen County Public Library on Oct. 30, 2007, Pequignot was presented with a belated Silver Star – the third-highest honor in the military – given for distinguished gallantry in action against an enemy of the United States. The Korean War Veterans hosted the event, and the medal was presented by then-state Sen. Gary Dillon.

Dillon remembers the event but has no idea where the Silver Star originated or where the order came from, he said. He was simply asked to show up and make the presentation, as elected officials are often asked to do, he said.

Although it’s possible that a belated award would not be found in many WWII records, the citation would have had to be signed by a senior Navy officer such as an admiral or a Department of the Navy civilian official at the secretary level, often both, said Col. Wayne Morris, USMC, of Jacksonville, N.C.

Pequignot was unable to produce any paperwork for the citation.

The belated Silver Star medal would have had to be processed through the Navy Board for Corrections of Military Records, said C. Douglas Sterner, curator for the Military Times Hall of Valor in Alexandria, Va.

“It doesn’t appear that was done,” he said.

James Yaney, a Korean War veteran who has pushed for the Medal of Honor for his friend Pequignot, said the Silver Star medal was sent directly from Veterans Affairs to Pequignot.

Sterner said Lugar’s office backed off the Medal of Honor nomination when officials at the Navy Decorations board found there was no validity to Pequignot’s claims.

The Medal of Honor is the highest award given to military personnel.

The Navy had been provided with a copy of Pequignot’s Purple Heart citation, which it deemed not to be authentic, said Sterner, who played a major role in the passage of federal law making it a misdemeanor to falsely claim a military medal.

“There is no evidence he earned a Silver Star or one, much less three, Purple Hearts,” Sterner said. “We do not believe he was a corpsman, and there is no evidence he was ever a prisoner of war.”

Yaney said he was “completely devastated” about the lack of evidence to support Pequignot’s claims.

Still, Pequignot maintains his version of his military service is the truth.

“There’s no way to prove I’m telling the truth if the Navy won’t present my side,” he said.

 

vsade@jg.net

Tags: , , , , ,

Today’s Entitlement Mentality…

April 30th, 2012 Posted in Military | 3 Comments »

 

This whole topic started among some pilot buddies of mine who were discussing some of the “Naval Aviation Pipelines..” websites out there.  The entitlement mentality is alive and well in the military aviation community as well as the 1st CivDiv.

 

A buddy of mine “Grinch” (thanks again for letting me post this Grinch) happened to be an extra on a flight where he was able to snap a bunch of pictures of one particular flight student (Stud for short) and his flight.  At the winging ceremony of the student he asked Grinch if he wouldn’t mind emailing those shots to his folks.  Not an uncommon request right?  Well it was the response from the parents that made Grinch sit back and say “WTH???”
Maybe the parents just assumed that if you got jets, you would be flying fighters but in this Stud’s case, he got S-3’s that provide the anti sub missions and tanking etc.  I have landed on the USS Lexington in the back of a TA-4 as ballast and know that flying any jet onto an aircraft carrier is just one of the most incredible feats an aviator can make as I watched the IP smoothly complete this ballet act.

 

So with that in mind, this email from the parents comes from what the son probably tells them (how he got screwed out of a fighter pilot slot etc) since he has talked about being a “Fighter Pilot” all his life and told anyone who would listen while at the Naval Academy that he was a shoe in for the F-18.

 

We had a Marine like this who was a graduate of the A.F. charm school when I was in primary down in Corpus.  When his time to select came up, he put down Jet’s, Jet’s and Jet’s (you get three choices, Jets/props/Helo’s) but it turns out he wasn’t even close to Jet grades and when he received Helo’s, he drove to his dad’s ranch in San Antonio and shot himself over the fact he didn’t get Jets.  His dad was an F-4/F-15 fighter pilot in the Air Force and if you weren’t a fighter pilot then you weren’t crap…what a waste.

 

So, guess the point of this post is to show you that while you might want one thing in life, you may get the other.  You need to realize that some things work out for a reason and embrace your life no matter what that may be.  As they say in our area, “Life is too short to live in Dallas”

 

Hat’s off to Grinch to patiently put together this fantastic response to the parents as to why little Johnny didn’t get that F-18 slot.  A lesson for all who wanted something but instead of door A, you opened door B.

S/F

Taco
…@aol.com wrote:
Just wanted to drop a line to thank you for the
photos. They all turned out great. We are certainly
proud of Kevin and what he has accomplished since his
graduation from the Naval Academy. It was his
ambition and goal to become a fighter pilot since
high school. But as you may know that was not the case
being assigned to S-3s. We still haven’t figured that
out yet. It would be nice if someone could explain to
us why that assignment and not just saying that is
what was available. We don’t completely buy that.
Anyway thanks again for thinking of us and sending the
pics. We certainly appreciate that. Take care, keep
safe and God Bless.

 

 

Mr. and Mrs. ….,
Glad you enjoyed the pictures. I’m also glad to hear that you’re proud of your son Kevin. You have good reason to be. He seems like a pretty good guy. I do not know specifics about Kevin’s selection. I’m not involved with that process at all. It wouldn’t be appropriate for me to discuss that information if I knew it anyway.

I would like to share with you the story of my own selection that might help put Kevin’s assignment into a better perspective for you. My goal since I was very young was to be a fighter pilot as well. But I too received orders to fly S-3s. I had slightly better than average grades. Average grades in the jet pipeline usually means a student will get fighters. I do not know what Kevin’s grades were but I know that aircraft selection depends heavily on grades. When I selected there was a pilot with a lower Navy Standard Score than mine that received orders to fly F-18s. Nobody explained to me why I received orders to fly S-3s and the pilot with the lower grades received orders to fly fighters.

But just before my winging I happened to be in the administrative office one afternoon when nobody was around and I saw my selection sheet. I put F-14’s first, F-18s…etc. At the bottom of the sheet I saw something handwritten by my Squadron Commanding Officer. It said “finished 12 out of 14, however, do not recommend for strike fighters.” (I have no idea if the process still works like this or not…perhaps the process has changed).

Why did my squadron commanding officer write that? I don’t know exactly. But I do know that he was doing his job right when he made a judgment call about my future based on whatever information he had. I assume that he had recommendations from several instructors in the squadron.

Then my situation became even worse than Kevin’s. After I had received my orders to fly S-3s, the Navy decided that it had too many S-3 pilots waiting for training and not enough E-2 pilots. So they changed my orders and sent 5 other S-3 guys and myself to fly E-2s instead (the E-2 is a disgusting looking airplane with turboprops and a large radar dome on top of it…even less desirable to fly than the S-3). I spent 4 years flying E-2C Hawkeyes. This was a much greater disappointment at the time. But the needs of the Navy for E-2 pilots outweighed my “need” to fly fighters or even S-3s.

Of course, like Kevin, I was quite upset when all of this selection business happened but less than a year into my sea tour I felt it was most appropriate that I ended up there. I came to believe that my Commanding Officer, whose judgment I so despised at the time of my winging, actually knew better than I did where I belonged as a pilot. Imagine that! …a senior pilot with 1,000s of hours being able to determine where new pilots would perform best for the Navy! He knew where I belonged even better than I did and certainly better than my parents did.

I don’t have time to go into why I believe that belonged outside the fighter community but trust me when I say that I now know it’s so. Now, not every person that gets S-3 or E-2 orders ends up believing they belonged there as I did. But most of them stay there. I know only one E-2 pilot that believed strongly enough that he belonged in a fighter that he pushed for and received a transition to fighters. That happened only after his first sea tour in E-2s.

Again I don’t know why Kevin received orders to fly S-3s. I have no idea what his grades were or what the overall assessment of his flying ability was. Perhaps the S-3 community needed a replacement pilot and Kevin’s name was randomly drawn out of a hat. Or perhaps the S-3 community was complaining that they had recently received a lot of bad students and so it was decided to send them the best pilot to finish the program in the last 20 years as a way to compensate them. And maybe Kevin was that guy.

Again, I don’t know how or why this decision was made. But what if the explanation was simply that your son was not up to the fighter community standards? Is that really an explanation that you’re prepared to take and would really want to hear? Perhaps they were doing Kevin and you a favor when they didn’t tell you exactly why he selected S-3s. Did that thought ever occur to you? Maybe nobody wanted to tell you that your son flew poorly and that he was actually extremely lucky to get winged in the first place. This happens sometimes. Would having any of these possible explanations before his winging have satisfied you? I couldn’t say for sure if any of my above explanations are true but any of them are possible. If you really care to know more about this then find out how Kevin’s grades were compared to his peers. Did he ever get any flight downs? Ask him. How did he do in ACM and WEPS?

Guess what…somebody has to fly S-3s (and even E-2s) and I’m not too cool or important to do that (neither is Kevin). Sure S-3s and E-2s aren’t as cool or fun to fly as fighters. But I have to tell you that there is nothing less honorable about flying S-3s or E-2s than there is in flying fighters…no matter what we wanted to fly when we were kids or how hard we worked to get fighters. Just being one of about 100 pilots on a ship is quite the honor you know. Are you aware of how many 1,000’s of jobs there are on a carrier that are less enjoyable or glorious than being a pilot? He’s lucky that he will get to fly. Period.

The truth is that your son Kevin doesn’t “deserve” fighters anymore or any less than I did or any more or less than a lot of other S-3 pilots out there. Selection isn’t about what somebody “deserves.” It’s about putting people where they will best serve the Navy. Kevin serves the United States Navy. That means he is a servant as am I. And right now he is a Navy servant with orders to fly S-3s. I hope he makes his service to the Navy in the S-3 community honorable. And I believe he will (even if he is disappointed at first like I was).
I understand your disappointment…trust me I do. So I hope all of you get over this soon. But it’s really not as important as you think. While the type of airplane I flew in the fleet might influence the flying stories I can tell or the way some of my peers look at me here in Meridian it does not define who I am as a person. I’ve only met a few of those types of people in each community who define themselves by the aircraft they fly and trust me…you don’t want your son to turn into that. His character is much more important than what type of plane he flies.

Bottom line…the Navy doesn’t owe it to you or your son to put him in fighters right now. It also doesn’t owe either of you an explanation about why he has S-3 orders. The Navy determined that’s where it needed him and that’s all the explanation any of us deserves. This explanation about orders is frequently used as an excuse for bitter people to get out of the Navy. That’s understandable. But this is the military and the needs of the service come first.

Kevin has the potential for a great career ahead of him. Much of that future will depend on what he makes of his first tour. Do everybody a favor and continue to know that you’re the proud parent of a son that serves in the United States Navy with honor…no matter what job he has been assigned. I wish you and your family all the best.

Very Respectfully,

P.S. If you’re still disappointed about this then you’ll be happy to know that S-3s are going away soon and so Kevin is probably going to transition to fighters in a couple of years anyway. Let’s not send him down that path with an improper perspective

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Fake Navy SEAL, You’ll love this guy

April 21st, 2012 Posted in Military | 23 Comments »

http://

 

This is from Don Shipley, a real SEAL who busts these guys left and right.  I thought this was pretty funny.  Skinny dude, medals from the first Gulf war and says he’s 33? Now I’m a Marine and Math 101 isn’t my strong suit but wouldn’t that make him like 12 when he fought over there in ’91?  He is listed on the POW/MIA site but they only had his first name of Greg and a crappy pictures.  Now we have it all.   His number is listed below, you might want to call and ask him how he got that age waiver.


“I had my beautiful cousin call this asshole. She said she would be comming to New Jersey, loved his uniform and wanted to ‘Hook Up.’ He said his name was GREG SHAFFER.” (sic) perhaps Shafer… His number is 201-315-7169. When she got his name I jumped in and asked his BUD/S Class and Team Assignment… He claimed Team THREE and BUD/S Class 103 in 1997…

Class 103 graduated training in 1979…

He hung up on me…

CLEARED HOT… Spank his phony ass, Guys…

Any information found please send me… ”

****UPDATE****

This turd has been arrested for raping a 15 year old.  Great piece from The Gothamist here.  Great job guys!!!

http://gothamist.com/2012/06/05/fake_seal_allegedly_tricked_15-year.php

Tags: , , ,

Dr. Phil, please don’t paint us all with a broad brush

April 20th, 2012 Posted in Military | No Comments »

 

 

The guys over at “You Served” have posted a story we need to read and watch.  While things happen, I’m afraid that concentrating on only the few bad examples, paints a pretty broad brush on all of our service members in a negative light who have served.  This is where the harsh stereo types of the crazed Vet come from and I for one will not tolerate it. 

Please read this…

S/F

Taco

 

PTSD: civilians just love to paint veterans as riddled with this disease, causing them to become violent, unhinged lunatics who will explode at the slightest provocation. Look at just about any news story where a violent crime is committed by a veteran, and PTSD is almost immediately floated as the reason. In the media narrative, violence and PTSD go hand-in-hand. At the same time, troops are criticized for not coming forward and admitting they have a problem, and seeking help for it. (Gee, could it possibly be because we paint veterans with PTSD as homicidal lunatics?)

Dr. Phil, arguably one of the most popular talk show hosts on the planet, decided to feature this issue on his show this week. And while he could have taken a reasonable approach, he went straight for the gut instead. Titling the show “From Heroes To Monsters”, he painted a picture of vets with PTSD as ticking time bombs of violence, describing them as damaged goods who “destroy families” and “dismantle marriages”.

Editor note: the video after the jump WILL autoplay.

 

One of Dr. Phil’s guests, Matt, is a former Marine who struggles with PTSD. He speaks about how, while deployed to Afghanistan, he repeatedly stabbed an enemy combatant in the face, even after he was dead, to get his anger out. He also claims he saw “lots” of innocent people killed, including women and children. (His last name isn’t given, so it’s impossible to verify his claims of killing women and children while deployed to Afghanistan.)

After Matt, Dr. Phil featured Mark and Heather. Mark is another veteran with PTSD who admits he has violent rages, says his life has been destroyed, and is afraid of what he will do to his family. Heather’s husband, Duane, had PTSD. He beat her and set her on fire.

The common thread between all of these stories: violence. Did Dr. Phil ever stop to point out that most veterans with PTSD don’t end up setting their wives on fire or stabbing people repeatedly in the face? Of course not. Indeed, recent research has found that the link between PTSD and violent behavior is actually weak. Another dirty little secret Dr. Phil didn’t feel was necessary to point out: civilians get PTSD, too. In fact, anyone can get it — anyone who has been through a trauma. According to the VA, about 7-8% of the general population will get PTSD at some point in their lives. For veterans, the risk is slightly higher, although not by much at 11-20%. And, believe it or not, the symptoms of PTSD do not include sudden violence such as setting your wife on fire or stabbing people in the face. Common symptoms include reliving the event, avoiding situations that remind you of it, feeling numb, feeling jittery, suddenly being angry or irritable, having trouble sleeping, etc. Setting your wife on fire? Not so much a normal occurrence. While relationship problems and violence may occur, acting as if it is a foregone conclusion (as Dr. Phil did) and saying that vets with PTSD are “monsters” is ridiculous and offensive.

It has been noted time and again, including here at You Served, that there is a stigma associated with veterans who have PTSD. While things may slowly be getting better, we still have a long way to go. And clearly, that goes for civilians as well. When the leading daytime talk show host runs a show calling veterans with PTSD “monsters” and “damaged goods”, it’s no wonder that there is a stigma attached to PTSD. The media gleefully paints vets who struggle with it as ticking time bombs, as stereotypes of lunatics about to snap at any given moment. The narrative isn’t new… but I don’t ever recall seeing veterans being so blatantly insulted by being called “monsters” and “damaged goods”.

I’m curious if Dr. Phil honestly thinks it’s helpful to paint such a negative, violent picture of veterans struggling with PTSD. I would wager he doesn’t care at all about how this affects our military. Because if he did, this show wouldn’t have existed. What he has done is continue to spread a false and harmful narrative about our troops, which spreads the stigma associated with PTSD even further. And what does that do? It encourages veterans who are struggling with symptoms of PTSD to become even more reluctant to come forward and seek help. Why would they? They’re being told that they’re monsters, damaged goods, violent abusive lunatics. While Dr. Phil is by no means the only perpetrator, this is by far the worst example I have seen in the media.

Having PTSD does not make you “damaged goods”. Does having cancer make someone damaged? What about depression, or bipolar disorder, or any number of other diseases? Telling someone who has PTSD that they are a monster and therefore need to get help makes about as much sense as telling a woman who has breast cancer that she’s damaged goods and therefore needs chemotherapy. It’s not going to encourage anyone to actually seek help. What it will surely do for vets, though, is reinforce the idea that they are somehow broken, that they’ll be judged and punished for having PTSD, and make them think that they are right to not tell anyone and to not get help. None of our troops who are afflicted with PTSD are monsters, they are not damaged, and 99% of them are not violent, homicidal maniacs about to snap at any moment.

The men and women who serve in our Armed Forces give up so much. They sacrifice their time with their families, their bodies, and their lives. For some, they sacrifice their mental health. This does not make them broken, or crazy, or violent, and it especially does not make them monsters. Meanwhile, here is Dr. Phil, taking the sacrifice and exploiting it, calling our troops — who have already given up so much for us — monsters. He should be ashamed of himself.

If he has any honor at all, any gratitude for the service of our veterans, he’ll issue an apology and a retraction. You can contact the Dr. Phil Show at:

http://www.facebook.com/drphilshow
https://twitter.com/DRPHIL
http://drphil.com/plugger/respond/?plugID=9164

Dr. Phil Show
5482 Wilshire Boulevard #1902
Los Angeles, CA 90036

Read more at YouServed: http://www.vamortgagecenter.com/blog/2012/04/20/dr-phil-vets-with-ptsd-are-damaged-goods-monsters/#ixzz1saWhcILs

Tags: , , ,

Vote for your favorite MilBlog

April 19th, 2012 Posted in The SandGram v1.0 | 2 Comments »
Guys,
It’s that time for you to vote for your favorite Mil blog.  I have made the list as a finalist this year which is a great honor and won this award a few years ago which was a blast too.  If you have a few minutes, please go over and vote for your favorite Blogs.  Just remember that you have to watch what blog you are really checking.  The box you want to check may be up above the blogs name and not not to it like you would think.  Click on the comment box next to the vote box to ensure you have the right vote. 
 
Check them out and read what they have to say. You will enjoy some of the great writers out there.  Makes me motivated to write more.  After all these years, flying and playing with kids, I need to get back in the grove.
S/F
Taco
 
 
You can now cast your online vote for your favorite military blog in each category on the Milblog Conference website. Click here to vote.

Voting will close on Friday, April 20, at 8pm EST/5pm PST.

Just like last year, the names of winners will be sealed until Friday, May 11, where they will be revealed at the Seventh Annual Milblog Conference

After the voting closes, I won’t even know the results up until the winners are announced on Friday, so make sure to keep up with the Twitter hashtag #milblogcon for news being posted by bloggers at the Mil blog Conference.

Winners are not required to attend the Milblog conference to receive an award.  Each finalist is welcome to send me an e-mail (milblogging@gmail.com) with their contact information or someone that is attending the conference who is entitled to accept a Milbloggies award on their behalf.

The results will be posted online after the Conference.

WWII BUFFS AND WINGED ONES

April 17th, 2012 Posted in The SandGram v1.0 | 3 Comments »
I love this stuff.  Like Vince Lewis and his lost tanks, David Cundall spent 15 years searching for hidden treasure in Burma…buried Spitfires from WWII.  Here is a great piece on this and then some wonderful facts about WWII that you might find interesting.
Semper Fi,
Taco

Spitfires buried in Burma during war to be returned to UK

Twenty iconic Spitfire aircraft buried in Burma during the Second World War are to be repatriated to Britain after an intervention by David Cameron.

A Spitfire flying from RAF Manston

A Spitfire flying from RAF Manston Photo: © Corbis. All Rights Reserved.

By , and Rowena Mason

7:00AM BST 14 Apr 2012

Comments1291 Comments

The Prime Minister secured a historic deal that will see the fighter aircraft dug up and shipped back to the UK almost 67 years after they were hidden more than 40-feet below ground amid fears of a Japanese occupation.

The gesture came as Mr Cameron became the first Western leader to meet Aung San Suu Kyi, the Burmese democracy campaigner held under house arrest for 22 years by the military regime, and invited her to visit London in her first trip abroad for 24 years.

He called on Europe to suspend its ban on trade with Burma now that it was showing “prospects for change” following Miss Suu Kyi’s election to parliament in a sweeping electoral victory earlier this year.

The plight of the buried aircraft came to Mr Cameron’s attention at the behest of a farmer from Scunthorpe, North Lincs, who is responsible for locating them at a former RAF base using radar imaging technology.

David Cundall, 62, spent 15 years doggedly searching for the planes, an exercise that involved 12 trips to Burma and cost him more than £130,000.

When he finally managed to locate them in February, he was told Mr Cameron “loved” the project and would intervene to secure their repatriation.

Mr Cundall told the Daily Telegraph: “I’m only a small farmer, I’m not a multi-millionaire and it has been a struggle. It took me more than 15 years but I finally found them.

”Spitfires are beautiful aeroplanes and should not be rotting away in a foreign land. They saved our neck in the Battle of Britain and they should be preserved.”

He said the Spitfires, of which there are only around 35 flying left in the world, were shipped to Burma and then transported by rail to the British RAF base during the war.

However, advances in technology and the emergence of more agile jets meant they were never used and officials abandoned them shortly before the end of the conflict.

“They were just buried there in transport crates,” Mr Cundall said. “They were waxed, wrapped in greased paper and their joints tarred. They will be in near perfect condition.”

The married father of three, an avid plane enthusiast, embarked on his voyage of discovery in 1996 after being told of their existence by a friend who had met some American veterans who described digging a trench for the aircraft during the Allied withdrawal of Burma.

He spent years appealing for information on their whereabouts from eye witnesses, scouring public records and placing advertisements in specialist magazines.

Several early trips to Burma were unsuccessful and were hampered by the political climate.

He eventually met one eyewitness who drew maps and an outline of where the aircraft were buried and took him out to the scene.

“Unfortunately, he got his north, south, east and west muddled up and we were searching at the wrong end of the runway,” he said.

“We also realised that we were not searching deep enough as they had filled in all of these bomb craters which were 20-feet to start with.

“I hired another machine in the UK that went down to 40-feet and after going back surveying the land many times, I eventually found them.

“I have been in touch with British officials in Burma and in London and was told that David Cameron would negotiate on my behalf to make the recovery happen.”

Mr Cundall said sanctions preventing the removal of military tools from Burma were due to be lifted at midnight last night (FRI).

A team from the UK is already in place and is expecting to begin the excavation, estimated to cost around £500,000, imminently. It is being funded by the Chichester-based Boultbee Flight Acadamy.

Mr Cundall said the government had promised him it would be making no claim on the aircraft, of which 21,000 were originally produced, and that he would be entitled to a share in them.

“It’s been a financial nightmare but hopefully I’ll get my money back,” he said.

“I’m hoping the discovery will generate some jobs. They will need to be stripped down and re-riveted but it must be done. My dream is to have a flying squadron at air shows.”

More stuff on this story…

British farmer’s quest to find lost Spitfires in Burma

A Lincolnshire farmer has told how he spent 15 years trying to find a lost squadron of Spitfires that was buried in Burma at the end of the Second World War.

A Lincolnshire farmer has told how he spent 15 years trying to find a lost squadron of Spitfires that was buried in Burma at the end of the Second World War.

Image 1 of 3
David Cundall with a painting of a Spitfire Photo: Sean Spencer

7:50AM BST 15 Apr 2012

Comments30 Comments

The extraordinary plans to dig up the lost squadron were revealed this weekend as David Cameron visits the country.

Now, David Cundall, 62, of Sandtoft, near Scunthorpe, has spoken about his quest to recover the Spitfires and get them airborne.

Mr Cundall has spent £130,000 of his own money, visited Burma 12 times, persuaded the country’s notoriously secretive regime to trust him, and all the time sought testimony from a dwindling band of Far East veterans in order to locate the Spitfires.

Yet his treasure hunt was sparked by little more than a throwaway remark from a group of US veterans, made 15 years ago to his friend and fellow aviation archaeologist Jim Pearce.

Mr Cundall said: “The veterans had served in a construction battalion. They told Jim: ‘We’ve done some pretty silly things in our time, but the silliest was burying Spitfires.’ And when Jim got back from the US, he told me.”

Mr Cundall realised that the Spitfires would have been buried in their transport crates.

Before burial, the aeroplanes would have been waxed, wrapped in greased paper and their joints tarred, to protect them against decay. There seemed to be a chance that somewhere in Burma, there lay Spitfires that could be restored to flying condition.

He was determined to find them. The first step was to place advertisements in magazines, trying to find soldiers who buried Spitfires.

“The trouble was that many of them were dying of old age.”

He visited Burma over and over again, slowly building friendly relations with the military junta that have for decades held power in the capital, Rangoon.

“In the end the minders trusted me so much they would let me hold their AK-47s while they ate the lunch I had bought them.”

And finally, he found the Spitfires, at a location that is being kept a closely guarded secret.

Mr Cundall said: “We sent a borehole down and used a camera to look at the crates. They seemed to be in good condition.”

Mr Cundall explained that in August 1945 the Mark XIV aeroplanes, which used Rolls-Royce Griffon engines instead of the Merlins of earlier models, were put in crates and transported from the factory in Castle Bromwich, in the West Midlands, to Burma.

Once they arrived at the RAF base, however, the Spitfires were deemed surplus to requirements. The war was in its final months and fighting was by now increasingly focused on ‘island-hopping’ to clear the Japanese of their remaining strongholds in the Pacific. Land-based Spitfires, as opposed to carrier-based Seafires, did not have the required range.

The order was given to bury 12 Spitfires while they were still in their transport crates.

Then two weeks later, the first atom bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. The Japanese surrendered on September 2 1945.

It is possible that a further eight Spitfires were then buried in December 1945, bringing the potential total of lost Spitfires to 20.

Mr Cundall said that about 21,000 Spitfires were built, but at the end of the war very few were wanted.

“In 1945, Spitfires were ten a penny. Jets were coming into service. Spitfires were struck off charge, unwanted. Lots of Spitfires were just pushed off the back of aircraft carriers into the sea.

“On land, you couldn’t leave them for the locals – they might have ended up being used against you. It was a typical British solution: ‘Let’s bury them lads.’ They might have planned to come back and dig them up again. They never did.”

To meet the £500,000 cost of the excavation Mr Cundall enlisted the help of Steve Boultbee Brooks, 51, a commercial property investor who also runs the Boultbee Flight Academy, in Chichester, West Sussex, which teaches people to fly on the two-seater Spitfire that Mr Brooks bought for £1.78 million in 2009.

Ground radar images showed that inside the crates were Spitfires with their wings packed alongside the fuselages.

The Britons now want to work to restore as many of the 20 Spitfires as possible and get them flying. If the project works, it will nearly double the number of airworthy Spitfires. There are currently only about 35 flying in the world.

Mr Cundall said: “We want to dig as many Spitfires up as we find.

“Spitfires are beautiful aeroplanes and should not be rotting away in a foreign land. They saved our neck in the Battle of Britain and they should be preserved.”

The final obstacle to recovering the Spitfires, however, is political: international sanctions forbid the movement of military materials in and out of Burma, and it was also feared the Burmese government would not allow any foreign excavations on their territory.

Because of the new, reforming stance of the Burmese government, it is likely some sanctions will be lifted after an EU review begins on April 23.

With the help of David Cameron and his visit to Burma, a deal is currently being negotiated and hopes are high that it will conclude with President Thein Sein of Burma granting permission for the dig.

Mr Brooks, who returned to his Oxford home on Saturday, after helping open negotiations with the Burmese authorities, said: “Our hope is that we can be digging them out in the next three or four weeks. Then the plan is to get as many of them flying as possible.

“They have been in the ground for more than 65 years, so it is not a case of taking them out of the crates, putting them together and flying them. There is a lot of work to do. We may have to use parts of many planes to make perhaps a couple airworthy.

“But if the crates didn’t get waterlogged, the Spitfires might be in pretty amazing condition. It’s also encouraging that they put teak beams over the crates so they wouldn’t be crushed by the earth when they were buried.”

Mr Cundall also raised the tantalising prospect that there may be more buried Spitfires out there.

“It’s possible there are other Spitfires buried around different sites in Burma. I have heard about 36 in one burial; 18 in another; 6 in another. And when they were buried, they would have been brand new, never taken out of the box.”

Mr Brooks, however, cautioned: “People have spent decades scouring the earth for Spitfires. If other aeroplanes are there, they may be very difficult to find.”

Subject: WWII BUFFS AND WINGED ONES
Most Americans who were not adults during WWII have no understanding of the magnitude of it. This listing of some of the aircraft facts gives a bit of insight to it. 
276,000 aircraft were manufactured in the U.S.
43,000  planes lost overseas, including 23,000 in combat.
14,000 lost in the continental U.S.
The  U.S. civilian population maintained a dedicated effort for four years, many working long hours seven days per week and often also volunteering for other  work. WWII  was the largest human effort in history.
Statistics are from Flight Journal magazine.THE  PRICE OF VICTORY (cost of an aircraft in WWII dollars)
B-17        $204,370.      P-40        $44,892.
B-24   $215,516.      P-47        $85,578.
B-25        $142,194.      P-51        $51,572.
B-26        $192,426.      C-47        $88,574.
B-29        $605,360.      PT-17      $15,052.
P-38          $97,147.      AT-6        $22,952.PLANES A DAY WORLDWIDE
From  Germany’s invasion of Poland Sept. 1, 1939 and ending with Japan’s surrender Sept. 2, 1945 — 2,433 days
From  1942 onward, America averaged 170 planes lost a day.

How many is a 1,000  planes?  B-17 production (12,731) wingtip to wingtip would extend 250  miles.  1,000 B-17s carried 2.5 million gallons of high octane fuel and required 10,000  airmen to fly and fight them.THE  NUMBERS GAME
9.7  billion gallons of gasoline consumed,  1942-1945.
107.8 million hours flown,  1943-1945.
459.7 billion rounds of aircraft  ammo fired overseas, 1942-1945.
7.9 million bombs  dropped  overseas, 1943-1945.
2.3 million  combat sorties, 1941-1945 (one sortie = one  takeoff).
299,230 aircraft accepted,  1940-1945.
808,471 aircraft engines accepted,  1940-1945.
799,972 propellers accepted,  1940-1945.


According  to the AAF Statistical Digest, in less than four years (December 1941- August 1945), the US Army Air Forces lost 14,903 pilots, aircrew and assorted  personnel plus 13,873 airplanes  — inside  the continental United  States. They were the result of 52,651 aircraft accidents (6,039 involving fatalities) in 45 months.

Think about those numbers. They average 1,170 aircraft accidents per month — nearly 40 a day.  (Less than one accident in four resulted in totaled aircraft, however.)
It gets worse…..
Almost 1,000 Army planes disappeared enroute from the US to foreign climes.  But an eye-watering 43,581 aircraft were lost overseas including 22,948 on combat missions (18,418 against the Western Axis) and 20,633 attributed to non-combat causes  overseas.

In a single 376 plane raid in August 1943, 60 B-17s were shot down. That was a 16  percent loss rate and meant 600 empty bunks in England.  In 1942-43 it was statistically impossible for bomber crews to complete a 25-mission tour in Europe.
Pacific theatre losses were far less (4,530 in combat) owing to smaller forces  committed.  The worst B-29 mission, against Tokyo on May 25, 1945, cost 26 Superfortresses, 5.6  percent of the 464 dispatched from the Marianas.
On an avrage, 6,600 American servicemen died per month  during WWII, about 220 a day. By  the end of the war, over 40,000 airmen were killed in combat theatres and another 18,000 wounded.  Some 12,000 missing men were declared dead,  including a number “liberated” by the Soviets but never returned.  More than 41,000 were  captured, half of the 5,400 held by the Japanese died in captivity, compared with one-tenth in German hands.  Total combat casualties were pegged at 121,867.

U.S. manpower made up the deficit.  The AAF’s peak strength was reached in 1944 with 2,372,000 personnel, nearly twice the previous year’s figure.
The losses were huge—but so were production totals.  From  1941 through 1945, American industry delivered more than 276,000 military aircraft. That number was  enough not only for U.S. Army, Navy and Marine Corps,  but for allies as diverse as Britain, Australia,  China and Russia.  In fact, from 1943 onward,  America produced more planes than Britain and Russia combined.  And more than Germany and Japan  together 1941-45.
However, our enemies took massive losses. Through much of 1944, the Luftwaffe sustained uncontrolled hemorrhaging,  reaching 25 percent of aircrews and 40 planes a month.  And in late 1944 into 1945, nearly half the pilots in Japanese squadrons had flown fewer than 200 hours. The disparity of two years before had been completely reversed.

Experience  Level:
Uncle  Sam sent many of his sons to war with absolute minimums of training. Some fighter pilots entered combat in 1942 with less than one hour in their assigned aircraft.
The  357th Fighter Group (often known as The Yoxford  Boys) went to England in late 1943 having trained on P-39s.  The group never saw a Mustang until shortly before its first combat mission.
A high-time P-51 pilot had 30 hours in type.  Many had fewer than five hours.  Some  had one hour.
With  arrival of new aircraft, many combat units transitioned in combat. The attitude  was, “They all have a stick and a throttle.  Go fly `em.” When  the famed 4th Fighter Group converted from P-47s to P-51s in February 1944, there was no time to stand  down for an orderly transition.  The  Group commander, Col. Donald Blakeslee,  said, “You  can learn to fly `51s on the way to the target.

A future P-47 ace said, “I  was sent to England to die.”  He was not alone.  Some fighter pilots tucked their wheels in the well on their first combat mission with one previous flight in the  aircraft.  Meanwhile, many bomber crews were  still learning their trade: of Jimmy Doolittle’s 15 pilots on the April 1942 Tokyo raid, only five had  won their wings before 1941. All but one of the 16 copilots were less than a year out of flight school.

In  WWII flying safety took a back seat to combat.  The AAF’s worst accident rate was recorded by the A-36 Invader version of the P-51: a staggering 274 accidents per 100,000 flying hours.  Next worst  were the P-39 at 245, the P-40 at 188, and the P-38  at 139.  All were Allison powered.

Bomber wrecks were fewer but more expensive.  The B-17  and B-24 averaged 30 and 35 accidents per 100,000 flight hours, respectively– a  horrific figure considering that from 1980 to 2000 the Air Force’s major mishap rate was less than 2.
The B-29 was even worse at 40; the world’s most sophisticated, most capable and most expensive  bomber was too urgently needed to stand down for mere safety reasons. The AAF set a reasonably high standard for B-29 pilots, but the desired figures were seldom attained.
The original cadre of the 58th Bomb Wing was to have 400 hours of  multi-engine time, but there were not enough experienced pilots to meet the criterion.  Only ten percent had overseas experience.  Conversely, when a $2.1 billion B-2 crashed in 2008,  the Air Force initiated a two-month “safety pause” rather than declare a “stand down”, let alone grounding.

The B-29 was no better for maintenance. Though the R3350 was known as a  complicated, troublesome power-plant, no more than half the mechanics had previous experience with the Duplex Cyclone.  But they made it work.

Navigators:
Perhaps the greatest unsung success story of AAF training was Navigators. The Army graduated some 50,000  during the War.  And many had never flown out of sight of land before leaving “Uncle Sugar” for a war zone.  Yet the huge majority found their  way across oceans and continents without getting lost or running out of fuel — a stirring tribute  to the AAF’s educational establishments.
Cadet  To Colonel:
It was possible for a flying cadet at the time of Pearl  Harbor to finish the war with eagles on his shoulders.  That was the record of John D.  Landers, a 21-year-old Texan, who was commissioned a second lieutenant on December 12, 1941.  He  joined his combat squadron with 209 hours total  flight time, including 20 in P-40s.  He finished the war as a full colonel, commanding an 8th Air Force Group — at age 24.
As the  training pipeline filled up, however those low figures became exceptions.
By early 1944, the average AAF fighter pilot entering combat had logged at least 450 hours, usually including 250  hours in training.  At the same time, many  captains and first lieutenants claimed over 600  hours.
FACT:
At its height in mid-1944, the Army Air Forces had 2.6  million people and nearly 80,000 aircraft of all types.
Today the US Air Force employs 327,000 active personnel (plus 170,000 civilians)  with 5,500+ manned and perhaps 200 unmanned aircraft.
The 2009 figures represent about 12 percent of the manpower and 7 percent of the airplanes of the WWII peak.
IN  SUMMATION:
Whether  there will ever be another war like that experienced in 1940-45 is doubtful, as fighters and bombers have given way to helicopters and remotely-controlled  drones over Afghanistan and Iraq. But within living memory, men left the earth in  1,000-plane formations and fought major battles five miles high, leaving a legacy that remains timeless.

This is an excellent summary of the effort required in WWII. It focuses on the American side of things, but the British, Germans and Japanese expended comparable energy and experienced similar costs. Just one example for the Luftwaffe; about 1/3 of the Bf109s built were lost in non-combat crashes. After Midway, the Japanese experience level declined markedly, with the loss of so many higher-time naval pilots. This piece is worth saving in hard copy.

Tags: , , ,

“Gunny” Skyler Whalen at it again…

April 15th, 2012 Posted in Military | 3 Comments »
Some people just can’t help living in a fantasy world and one of those guys is a Tango named Skyler Whalen.  When this Power Point about him  SKYLER WHALEN1 was sent to me, I didn’t bother even running him on my blog only because of the massive harassment he was already receiving from the public at large.  But I guess being exposed as a Fake Poser Marine wasn’t enough for him, he decided to become Police Officer as well.
Recently he was arrested for posing as a Police Officer, while carrying a pistol, vest and badge. Gina Cavallaro from the Marine Corps Times, put a nice piece together on him.  The passenger in his car claims he was on a Police “ride along” with Whalen which gives me another chuckle.  The best part is after being released from jail, the neighbors see him leaving the house dressed as a Marine again.  I know this kid (actually he’s 18) must have some mental problems and the scary thing is, he can vote and one day he may have kids…
Semper Fi,  Taco

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Nominate a Mil Blog…

April 9th, 2012 Posted in Military | No Comments »

 

Hey Guys,

 

It’s the time again to nominate a Mil Blog for recognition for this past year.  If you are into reading Military related Blogs, do me a favor, sign up with MilBlogging through one of the links below and show your favorite writer some Love!! I am honored to have claimed this award for the Corps in the past and it’s a great privilege to be on the receiving end of it.   It only takes a few minutes fill out and you can find your choice of services/categories below.  Thanks again for your time, it means a lot to those guys who put stories to paper.

Semper Fi,

Taco

April 9, 2012
  
Nominations in the 2012 Milbloggies are now open. 

Nominate a blog by clicking a link below.

U.S. Military Parent – Nominations
U.S. Military Supporter – Nominations
U.S. Air Force – Nominations
U.S. Army – Nominations
U.S. Navy – Nominations
U.S. Marine Corps – Nominations
U .S. Coast Guard – Nominations
U.S. Military Veteran – Nominations
U.S. Military Spouse – Nominations
U.S. Reporter – Nominations

On Thursday, April 12, nominations will close.

Please make sure to read the rules before nominating a military blog.

More information here.

Questions? Send an email to milblogging@gmail.com
To unsubscribe from Milblogging.com`s weekly newsletter, pleas e click here

Nominations Rules

  • only one nomination per blog is necessary per category.  Duplicate comments may be deleted.
  • each nomination must include a web address and title.
  • nominations must be relevant to their respective category (for example, only bloggers currently serving in the Army National Guard, Army Reserves, or Active Duty Army are eligible for the Best U.S. Army Blog category).  Nominations placed in the wrong category may not be considered.  A link to the author’s bio demonstrating eligibility in their respective category is highly recommended.  If category eligibility cannot be confirmed, the blog may not considered.
  • spam and unrelated comments may be deleted.
  • a minimum of five nominations must be placed in each category for different blogs, in order for that category to go onto to the Voting phase.  This rule may be changed due to the lower number of blogs in some categories.
  • please make sure the comment you left appears in the comments. Don’t assume.

Nomination FAQs

Q:  How do I nominate a blog for the 2012 Milbloggies?

A: Place your nomination in the Comments section for the respective category.

Q:  How are finalists selected?

A:  This year’s Milbloggies finalists will be selected from the nominees left in the Comments sections.  Up to 10 finalists will be selected.

IMPORTANT:  Rules, deadlines and awards are subject to change at any time.

Eligibility

Blogs that meet the criteria of a participating category are eligible for a Milbloggie nomination.  However, a blog must be nominated in the comments in order to be considered.

Blogs that are part of the official Military.com network are not eligible for the Milbloggies.  Military.com blogs include but are not limited to the following properties:

Tags: , , , ,